Peer review or arbitration process. An editorial board asks subject matter experts to review and evaluate submitted articles before accepting them for publication in a scientific journal. Submissions are evaluated based on criteria such as excellence, novelty and importance of the research or ideas. Scholarly journals use this process to protect and. The peer review process is the long-standing method by which research quality is ensured. On the one hand, it aims to assess the quality of a manuscript, the desired result being theoretical. If the systematic review includes only published, peer-reviewed journal articles, checklists from the CASP Critical Appraisal Skills Program, the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, the SIGN Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, or the Joanna Briggs Institute will be appropriate. Medicine, for example in Academic Search Premier, click the Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, Journals box on the search screen. Review articles are another great way to find primary research articles. Review articles are not considered primary research, but they collect primary research articles on a topic, summarize and analyze them. This article offers succinct advice on peer review: not only “what to do” for good, but also “what not to do” for good. Bad and “what never to do” the Ugly. It presents peer review models and provides insight into the types of reviewer biases, including conflicts of interest. More recent developments in journal peer review, such as.