The Post-Washington Consensus succeeded in becoming the new theoretical basis for the World Bank's structural adjustment policies in developing countries. This wide-ranging critique explains that without a much broader political economy, the Post-Washington Consensus is unlikely to provide a coherent solution. By examining the evolution of the IMF's structural conditionalities and the thematic distribution of the Bank's commitments, it provides evidence of a significant change on the ground: a partial withdrawal from the post-Washington Consensus PWC program, which marked a upgrade of orthodox neoliberalism at the turn of the century. The persistence of neoliberalism under the AMLO government is evident in the monetary and financial policies pursued, particularly in the context of the pandemic which merge successive neoliberal approaches and socio-economic regulation, namely the Washington Consensus, post- Washington and the Wall Street consensus. China's success and burgeoning economic prosperity in recent decades have led to growing debates in academic and policy circles about the relevance of the Washington Consensus to 21st century development. Asongu et al. 2018. Accounts vary among others: the lost decades, the Washington Consensus, a term coined by Williamson, which refers to a set of ten policy prescriptions promoted by institutions based in Washington, DC, mainly the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, the World Bank and the US Treasury and by the governments of free market-loving “Western” countries.