Thomas Aquinas, while offering five proofs for the existence of God in his Summa Theologica, opposed Anselm's argument. He suggested that people cannot know the nature of God and, therefore, cannot conceive of God in the way Anselm proposed. The ontological argument would only make sense to someone who: The cosmological argument is less a particular argument than a type of argument. It uses a general model of logos argumentation which makes an inference from particular alleged facts about the cosmos of the universe to the existence of a single being, usually identified with or called God. Among these initial facts are these particular facts, a number of recent discussions. of atheism allude to cosmological arguments in favor of theism. Aquinas' five paths are classic examples, offered as a rational justification for theistic belief. However, the five paths are little neglected. They are curtly rejected as meaningless, arbitrary and even insulting to reason. I argue that the,